[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug or feature?
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Bug or feature? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:27:19 -0000 |
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:34 AM
I'd prefer this as a @knownissues or even a @warning. I
/definitely/ wouldn't include it in the same parapraph -- remember
that the number of people reading a paragraph decreases
exponentially as the length of the paragraph increases[1].
But this paragraph, even with the warning, is only
4 lines long!? And it is the first paragraph in the
section.
Making it a @knownissue would be far worse - this
would place it several pages below.
People normally wouldn't expect the order of the \includes to
matter, so IMO we should make this quite visible.
I guess a @warning might be better.
Trevor
- Re: Bug or feature?, (continued)
- Re: Bug or feature?, Graham Percival, 2009/03/08
- Re: Bug or feature?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/03/08
- Re: Bug or feature?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/03/08
- Re: Bug or feature?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/03/09
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Graham Percival, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/11
Re: Bug or feature?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/09
Re: Bug or feature?, Carl Sorensen, 2009/03/14