Re: Bug or feature?

[Trevor Daniels]

Pushed to origin/master.  Thanks Jonathan.

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Kulp" <address@hidden>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>; "David Kastrup" 
<address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; "Carl D. Sorensen" 
<address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: Bug or feature?


> Patch attached!
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Trevor Daniels 
> <address@hidden>wrote:
>
> > Jonathan Kulp wrote Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:38 AM
> >
> >
> >  Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > > > Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:34 AM
> > > >
> > > >  I'd prefer this as a @knownissues or even a @warning.  I
> > > > > /definitely/ wouldn't include it in the same parapraph --  
> > > > > remember
> > > > > that the number of people reading a paragraph decreases
> > > > > exponentially as the length of the paragraph increases[1].
> > > >
> > > > But this paragraph, even with the warning, is only
> > > > 4 lines long!?  And it is the first paragraph in the
> > > > section.
> > > >
> > > > Making it a @knownissue would be far worse - this
> > > > would place it several pages below.
> > > >
> > > >  People normally wouldn't expect the order of the \includes to
> > > > > matter, so IMO we should make this quite visible.
> > > >
> > > > I guess a @warning might be better.
> > >
> > > So do you guys want me to re-work this as a @warning?
> >
> > Please.  Perhaps a warning to replace the text where
> > it is and also add it as a @knownissue too.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Trevor
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Kulp
> http://www.jonathankulp.com