lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond


From: Dave Plater
Subject: Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:00:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0

On 01/05/2010 03:16 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 11:38 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
> [keeping cc on list]
>
>   
>> On 01/05/2010 11:12 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>     
>>> Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 07:52 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
>>> Plater:
>>>       
>   
>>> see the attached lily-65a7b1b1-1.eps; however it seems that currently
>>> ghostscript and ghostscript-debuginfo ar out of sync on factory; I
>>> cannot create a backtrace.
>>>       
>   
>> Interesting, I've just finished the final, not tested on build service,
>>     
> Yes, that's interesting.  Does the gs command thas segfaults for me
> work for you?  Are you running factory?  I filed n#568280
>
>   
>> The i586 builds have just failed in build service, I have to do some
>> paying work now and haven't time to go through the build log but you can
>> find it at :-
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=lilypond&project=home%3Aplater%3Abranches%3AopenSUSE%3AFactory%3AContrib&repository=openSUSE_11.2
>> and then use the link at the bottom left "download raw logfile" to view
>> the whole log, including the versions of packages used for build.
>>     
> Weird.  It may be because you do not use DESTDIR anymore in your
> spec but instead prepend buildroot to webdir?  That's a scary
> thing to do imnsho :-)  
>
> If the make install command uses/installs in any other directory
> too (infodir?) will touch the root file system instead of the package
> build root, right?
>
> Although I cannot imagine why this would have worked on x86_64, then.
>
> Greetings,
> Jan.
>   
Just got back, at first I thought it was due to the use of parallel
builds, build service defaults to 4 and disabled that but that has also
failed during document build, not install on :-
|command failed:
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/out/bin/lilypond -I ./ -I
./out-www -I ../../input -I ../../input/lsr/ -I ../../input/regression/
-I ../../input/manual/ -I ../../input/tutorial/ -I
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/mf/out/ -I
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/mf/out/ -I
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/manual -I
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/Documentation -dbackend=eps
--formats=ps,png,pdf -dinclude-eps-fonts -dgs-load-fonts
--header=doctitle --header=doctitlefr --header=doctitlees
--header=doctitlede --header=doctitleja --header=texidoc
--header=texidocfr --header=texidoces --header=texidocde
--header=texidocja -dcheck-internal-types -ddump-signatures
-danti-alias-factor=2 -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/out/lybook-db" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/regression" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/regression" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/regression/out-www" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/lsr" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/regression" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/manual" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/tutorial" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/mf/out" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/mf/out" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/input/manual" -I
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/Documentation" --formats=eps
--verbose -deps-box-padding=3.000000 -dread-file-list
-dno-strip-output-dir
"/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--7471402555679770406.ly"

Can you make anything of this? I'm going to look for a newer ghostscript
in build service and try building against that. At least it fails on
x86_64 and i586 on 11.0 through to factory. I left an rpmbuild going
when I left and it's succeeded again.
Regards
Dave P
|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]