[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:23:43 +0000 |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Boris Shingarov <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Umm. It would be *way*, ***way*** easier to download lilybuntu and do
>> a normal compile in there
>
> Then I probably had misunderstood the purpose of Lilybuntu -- I thought this
> was for people who did not have a real linux setup for doing lilypond
> development -- like, having all the prerequisites in place etc. For
> *development*, I am completely fine and happy. It's that I am now happy
> with the development results and need to deploy, and the ultimate users do
> not use linux. How does lilybuntu produce the win32 binary anyway?
> wouldn't it need to do the exact same crosscompile as what would happen in
> a physical ubuntu box?
I see.
Well, if you are determined to build executables for win32, then GUB
is the only way. I welcome more help with it, but my warnings still
stand. My initial guess is that it will take 10 hours to build a
win32 installer (called "mingw" in gub) using the standard method. To
build from your own git tree, I estimate another 5 hours after the
"standard" installer is working.
The next step is to try "make lilypond" and see if/when it breaks.
Good luck!
- Graham
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, (continued)
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, Graham Percival, 2010/01/14
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, Boris Shingarov, 2010/01/13
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, Boris Shingarov, 2010/01/14
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, Boris Shingarov, 2010/01/14
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, Boris Shingarov, 2010/01/14
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: GUB buiding from a local source tree?, Boris Shingarov, 2010/01/20