[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Patch] Absolute dynamics as postfix text (issue2220041)
From: |
percival . music . ca |
Subject: |
Re: [Patch] Absolute dynamics as postfix text (issue2220041) |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:05:40 +0000 |
Initial comments, not a complete review. BTW, these files just say
"upload in progress". Could you re-upload the patch, maybe after a few
fixes?
scm/define-markup-commands.scm scm/font.scm
scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm
http://codereview.appspot.com/2220041/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely
File Documentation/notation/expressive.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2220041/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode483
Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:483: the @code{\dynamic}
command.
I'd write simply
---
Custom centered dynamic marks can be created:
---
I know the old version "talked through the code", but I really don't
think it's necessary.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2220041/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode486
Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:486: sfzp = \dynamic sfzp
This is really a code comment rather than docs, but since I'm here
anyway...
Could this be
\dynamic { sfzp }
instead? I get nervous without the {}. This may well require a
different modification to the parser.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2220041/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode541
Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:541: By default,
@{make-dynamic-script} handles any markup object as
I think you mean: @code{}
This breaks the doc build. *cough* <grumpily glances around to make
sure that David isn't looking>you idiot</grumpy>
<fluffy>
I implore you, oh kind and gentle contributor, to check a full build,
from scratch, before proposing a large change.
</fluffy>
http://codereview.appspot.com/2220041/