Re: Tablature: proper support for tie/slur- and tie/glissando-constellations (issue2191042)

[Carl Sorensen]

On 10/28/10 1:54 PM, "Marc Hohl" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Am 28.10.2010 14:53, schrieb address@hidden:
>> Currently, I view Scheme engravers as a way for users (and snippets) to
>> add engraver functionality, but not as an optimal way to add core
>> functionality.
> 
> I understand your argument, but I think that it would be better to
> include scheme engravers
> into the docs before recoding the Tab_tie_follow_engraver in c++. At
> least, I cannot cope with this.
> Aside from that, I think that more extensions on the scheme side
> (including engravers)
> are about to come.
> 

I would *love* to have a way to document Scheme engravers such that we could
include them in the docs, but at present I have no knowledge of how to do
so.

Can anybody shed any light on this?

Thanks,

Carl