Re: Cleanup beam scoring code. (issue4001046)

[Reinhold Kainhofer]

Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 15:54:36 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> There is one diff remaining: see the attached file.  I introduced
> >> some streamlining of an inner loop, which affects the way we handle
> >> beams that start/end with invisible stems.
> >> 
> >> The compare image is the new one.  I have no examples of tremolo beams
> >> handy, but the new layout actually looks better to me.
> > 
> > For me, it doesn't.  While the old behaviour is not optimal, the new
> > one looks really worse to me, especially in bar 3 (which is admittedly
> > a quite artificial example).  The most important issue for me: Why is
> > there no slant of the beams?  I currently have not enough time to
> 
> But the old version also had no slant?  I'm inclined to take interpret
> all these answers as "tremolo on whole notes was broken, and it still
> is, just differently," 

Exactly.
BTW, the pages from Read and Stone that I quoted are up at:
http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/~reinhold/LilyPond/WholeNoteTremolo/

Cheers,
Reinhold

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org