[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: branching |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:30:06 +0200 |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthias Kilian <address@hidden> wrote:
> 1. is the way to go. Sure, it would put some pressure on people
> working on big changes, which kind of sucks (it could even slow
> down implementing cool new stuff). On the other hand, it enforces
> smaller steps towards new features, which is good (easier to track
> down regressions, easier to *understand* what's going on).
I'm not entirely sure everything can be implemented using small steps
(e.g. spacing code overhaul, as has happened in the past).
As I suggested this summer, the new Fedora branching model looks
pretty interesting to me:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched
(then again, developing a whole distribution is certainly very
different from developing a relatively specialized project such as
Lily).
Of course, it does require some resources. But (as always) I do trust
Carl to be exactly the person we need :-)
Cheers,
Valentin.
Re: branching, Matthias Kilian, 2011/04/15
Re: branching, Trevor Daniels, 2011/04/16
Re: branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/04/16