[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041) |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:47:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:33:54PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> I should've noticed that also.
>
> Patches attached.
thanks, applied after squashing them into one patch. You might
want to look into
git rebase -i origin/master
also, your git repo might be unhappy the next time you do git
pull. Depends on whether it can auto-merge them or not.
Cheers,
- Graham
- describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/14
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/14
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/15
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/15
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/15
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/15