[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041) |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:55:36 +0200 |
2011/6/15 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> thanks, applied after squashing them into one patch.
issue closed.
> You might want to look into
> git rebase -i origin/master
I know this. This change was originally 4 commits long, i reduced it to 2 :P
Next time i'll reduce more.
> also, your git repo might be unhappy the next time you do git
> pull. Depends on whether it can auto-merge them or not.
It is unhappy, but i deleted that branch and don't worry about it.
thanks,
Janek
- describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/14
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/14
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/15
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/15
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/15
- Re: describing regression checking more explicitely (issue4621041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/15