[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting
From: |
Jan Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:10:50 +0200 |
2011/6/22 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> I see three main contenders:
>
> * emacs x.y.z with extra post-processing: our current
> “official” style with scripts/auxiliar/fixcc.py
> * astyle 2.0.2, possibly with extra post-processing
> * uncrustify 0.58
I'm confused. Are we talking about choosing indent style or choosing
the tool that will automatically apply whichever style we want?
> ** Eliminate tabs
>
> I’m going to make the bold step of assuming that we will eliminate
> tabs in all C++ files.
+1. Let's just say NO to tabs.
> ** Detailed analysis of emacs+post vs. astyle
>
> You can compare the results directly with this:
>
> git diff origin/dev/gperciva-fixcc origin/dev/gperciva-astyle
when i call this in ~/lilypond-git, i get
fatal: ambiguous argument 'origin/dev/gperciva-fixcc': unknown
revision or path not in the working tree.
...?
I went to
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=heads
and compared some files manually, but there were almost no
differencies - am i missing something?
cheese,
Janek
- GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Keith OHara, 2011/06/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting,
Jan Warchoł <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Carl Sorensen, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/25
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/25
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/25
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Trevor Daniels, 2011/06/22
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Hans Aberg, 2011/06/22
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Valentin Villenave, 2011/06/25