[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:33:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
> Werner LEMBERG wrote Sunday, August 21, 2011 6:13 AM
>
>> Well, it helps in situations like this
>>
>> This is a paragraph with some text to
>> demonstrate that a path name like
>> /usr/local/share/lilypond/foo.bar
>> should be split after backslashes.
>>
>> which looks better with a break after the backslash:
>
> This is sensible, and I agree replacing / with /@/ here is good. But
> changing
> "and/or" to "and/@/or" is bad (one you
> changed recently.) Splitting such short strings will make little
> difference to the
> layout, and I would argue that placing
> the "/or" at the start of a new line renders
> the text less readable, not more.
Uh what? This places "and/" at the end of the line, and "or" at the
beginning of the next line. And that is not really a significant
impediment to reading.
--
David Kastrup
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Graham Percival, 2011/08/20
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/08/21
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Graham Percival, 2011/08/22
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/08/23