[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:16:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Please read:
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting
> > in particular the point about #.
...
> I interpret as being used for inline samples and the like.
Ah, good point! I glanced at the subject line and didn't notice
that you were only changing the "text" parts and not @lilypond
parts.
I withdraw this complaint.
> Please be more specific what I'm missing. In particular, many
> locations which I've fixed (at least in my opinion) were talking
> about, say, `#t' and `#foo' at the same time, which I consider *very*
> confusing. There are two possiblities to fix it: Either by saying
> `#t' and `foo', or by saying `##t' and `#foo'.
Hmm. I still have no clue about the difference between #t and
#foo, which certainly emphasizes that there *is* confusion.
The decision to always prepend with a # for any lilypond input
which accepts it (even if not strictly necessary) was made in GDP,
but that only narrows it down to Sep 2007 - Aug 2008. I think it
was in the first half, but that doesn't help much. :(
I spent a few minutes looking through the email archives without
finding the discussion, sorry.
However, that discussion was specifically about @lilypond stuff,
not the text. So I'm now ok with this change; thanks for
explaining it to me.
Cheers,
- Graham