[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:26:23 +0200 |
2011/8/21 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> Please be more specific what I'm missing. In particular, many
>> locations which I've fixed (at least in my opinion) were talking
>> about, say, `#t' and `#foo' at the same time, which I consider *very*
>> confusing. There are two possiblities to fix it: Either by saying
>> `#t' and `foo', or by saying `##t' and `#foo'.
>
> Hmm. I still have no clue about the difference between #t and
> #foo, which certainly emphasizes that there *is* confusion.
Just for the record: i remember being confused by this myself when i
was a beginner.
In general scheme stuff is very confusing for beginners:
#
##
#'
,
and especially
`
:(
cheers,
Janek
- not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Graham Percival, 2011/08/19
- Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Graham Percival, 2011/08/20
- Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/08/21
- Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Graham Percival, 2011/08/22
- Re: not all doc "clean-ups" are good, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/08/23