[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:42:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.0; i686; ; ) |
Am Thursday, 15. September 2011, 22:29:21 schrieben Sie:
> 2011/9/15 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> > Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
> > real problems.
My experience from the C++ formatting run is that those whitespace changes are
really no big deal. Rebasing does not cause that many conflicts usually, and
those can be manually fixed easily.
> i'd love to see more comments in the code! Currently i have hard time
> reading note-collision.cc - after more than an hour i still only have
> a vague idea what's going on there. If anyone'd like to explain this,
> i'd be greatful! I cannot write a good fix for 1546 until i
> understand note-collision.cc
I can only second that: Having more comments would really help me understand
in many case what's going on and what's the purpose of some particular code
and the logic.
Personally, I try to include lots of comments, so that whenever I'll look at
the code again, I don't have to think it through in detail, bue have the
comments tell me all about the code in human-understandable language.
In particular, if someone uses some clever code, or a nasty workaround, we
really need some comments to understand what's goind on.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, (continued)
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, David Kastrup, 2011/09/15
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/22
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/15
GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21