Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

David Kastrup writes:

> The main problem is that it is catastrophic with regard to rebasing, and
> still rather disruptive with regard to merging.

+1

> Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
> real problems.

+1

Also, I'm not going to start the C++ indentation discussion all over
again.  I did not read this proposal as I figured that it would do the
only sensible thing: formalise the status quo while allowing people who
are not using Emacs yet to indent their files the GNU way using a
script.  We're a GNU project, remember?

Please find an indenter that does what Emacs does.  Most every .scm
is indented by Emacs now.  And please, pretty please, give Emacs
another try.

Greetings, Jan

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl