Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation

[Carl Sorensen]

On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> There's been no action on this for a few weeks.  I'm starting to
> wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
> in a few months.

Why?

The only outstanding issue is that the else indentation is not the same as
Emacs, but Neil hasn't responded to the setting that he would like.

AFAICS, the script works fine.  Neil isn't yet satisfied, but he hasn't
identified any weaknesses; he's just expressed a vague concern.

Thanks,

Carl