[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:20:22 +0100 |
On 15 Sep 2011 00:31, "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
> > wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
> > in a few months.
>
> Why?
>
> The only outstanding issue is that the else indentation is not the same as
> Emacs, but Neil hasn't responded to the setting that he would like.
I don't mind the else indentation, but there are a few other issues (I mentioned them briefly in another post).
I'll post a more thorough review later.
Cheers,
Neil
- GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/07
- GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/14
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/14
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/15
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, David Kastrup, 2011/09/15
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Graham Percival, 2011/09/22
Re: GOP-PROP 10: scheme indentation, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/15