[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol? |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:17:07 +0100 (CET) |
> Well, if the code whizs are too lazy documenting what they know and
> choose to frolic on the beach instead, they might at least be useful
> for proofreading between two sips of Bacardi, don't you think?
:-)
Calm down, David. Noone is complaining about your work (on the
contrary, we all very much appreciate it, but only a few of us do
really understand what you actually do), however, sometimes your
grumpiness exceeds Graham's mood attacks.
Werner
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, (continued)
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Graham Percival, 2011/12/03
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, James, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Graham Percival, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, address@hidden, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Graham Percival, 2011/12/05
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Phil Holmes, 2011/12/05
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04