[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol? |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:46:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>> Well, if the code whizs are too lazy documenting what they know and
>> choose to frolic on the beach instead, they might at least be useful
>> for proofreading between two sips of Bacardi, don't you think?
>
> :-)
>
> Calm down, David. Noone is complaining about your work (on the
> contrary, we all very much appreciate it, but only a few of us do
> really understand what you actually do), however, sometimes your
> grumpiness exceeds Graham's mood attacks.
The calming ritual takes even more time than writing documentation, let
alone proofreading.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, (continued)
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, James, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Graham Percival, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, address@hidden, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Graham Percival, 2011/12/05
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Phil Holmes, 2011/12/05
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/12/04
- Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?,
David Kastrup <=