[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make fails for staging branch
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: make fails for staging branch |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:28:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:17:57AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>> That order of commands suggests that lily-lexer-scheme.cc does not
>> depend on parser.cc. I see that it contains such an #include, so
>> I would assume that make would catch it... but apparently not.
>
> Skimming through lily/GNUmakefile, this makes sense. There's a
> couple of explicit dependencies for parser.hh, but these don't
> mention lily-lexer-scheme.cc, which is the file that triggers the
> fail.
But the out/lily-lexer-scheme.dep file mentions it in the last line:
../flower/include/arithmetic-operator.hh include/pitch.hh out/parser.hh
Does that mean that we generate the dependencies without actually using
them? That sounds rather stupid, but then I don't understand the build
system anyhow.
> Could somebody check this in more detail, then add the required
> dependencies to lily/GNUmakefile? Push directly to staging.
I'll check what is there. As I said already: the single-job build does
not appear to have a problem.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but that was really unforeseeable for me.
--
David Kastrup
- make fails for staging branch, James, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22