[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make fails for staging branch
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: make fails for staging branch |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:53:07 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:28:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Skimming through lily/GNUmakefile, this makes sense. There's a
> > couple of explicit dependencies for parser.hh, but these don't
> > mention lily-lexer-scheme.cc, which is the file that triggers the
> > fail.
>
> But the out/lily-lexer-scheme.dep file mentions it in the last line:
> ../flower/include/arithmetic-operator.hh include/pitch.hh out/parser.hh
>
> Does that mean that we generate the dependencies without actually using
> them? That sounds rather stupid, but then I don't understand the build
> system anyhow.
... yes? no?
Bottom line: somebody added explicit dependencies to
lily/GNUmakefile, for some reason. It could have been somebody
not really understanding the build system, but at least it worked.
I wouldn't be surprised if Julien sent in a patch in a few
hours/days that removed the explicit dependencies for the parser
in favor of a more general solution. :)
> Sorry for the inconvenience, but that was really unforeseeable for me.
No problem; I'm quite happy that Patchy is pulling his weight so
soon. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
- make fails for staging branch, James, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Graham Percival, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, David Kastrup, 2011/12/22
- Re: make fails for staging branch, Francisco Vila, 2011/12/22