Re: make fails for staging branch

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:05:22AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/12/23 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> > No idea.  But the symptom would suggest that
> >
> > commit 77cfd9e80a9792737a8630ba3c3ecfb359950f9d
> > Author: Francisco Vila <address@hidden>
> > Date:   Wed Dec 21 22:54:53 2011 +0100
> >
> >    Web: remove web/ in some pathnames.
> >
> > could be a likely candidate for backing out and retesting.  The other
> > recent changes seem less probable.
> 
> Not unless you really think that changes in @verbatim, @example and
> quoted strings in CG could make 'make' to break. Or do you?

Nope; there's nothing suspicious in there.  It's purely a doc
change.

Hmm... my "most likely suspicious" list is:
2525b18911b13eff04860d0b85e939a2fb4dab57
3c7c453b1fa4604a02e28787777918a5ae3de4fa
229e0282758104ae7fa2efe663d2a76da5a0f96d
ab8c075d4415180f2ecd9d94c13fa1d0463cfd67
Not because I think the build-system changes are bad, but simply
because I've seen a ton of unintended consequences from any change
to the build system.

d82eb992f3c17c42b9d01861d2c90d551d155620
simply because it adds one more regtest, so potentially it could
have put the total above the limit.  (i.e. we might need to
're-bin' the regtest list)

Cheers,
- Graham