Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent

[David Kastrup]

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers
>>appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_
>>listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music
>>iterator _does_ broadcast them instead of leaving them as articulations.
>
> The tabstaff engraver team listens to *both* string number events *and*
> articulations. Combining the two is a bit of a pain.

If nobody listens to string number events, they will stay articulations
except when placed explicitly on chords like <c>\3 and then you deserve
what you don't get.

> That's why I asked earlier to get some consistency.  If we can get
> string number events to always be in articulations, we don't need to
> broadcast string number events.  If the rhythmic music iterator can
> make them always show up as articulations, that would be great.

That would be the case.

-- 
David Kastrup