Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent

[David Kastrup]

Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 21.01.2012 18:44, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, "David Kastrup"<address@hidden>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers
>>> appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_
>>> listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music
>>> iterator _does_ broadcast them instead of leaving them as articulations.
>> The tabstaff engraver team listens to *both* string number events *and*
>> articulations. Combining the two is a bit of a pain.
>>
>> That's why I asked earlier to get some consistency.  If we can get string
>> number events to always be in articulations, we don't need to broadcast
>> string number events.  If the rhythmic music iterator can make them always
>> show up as articulations, that would be great.
> I must admit that I am lost here and do not quite understand what's
> going on,
> but will there be any difference between
>
> < c\3 e\2 g\1 > and < c e g >\3\2\1
>
> once these changes are implemented?

The latter would not display anything anywhere.

-- 
David Kastrup