[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:35:24 -0000 |
Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
I assume it uses the "normal" git cache on my computer
Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in the LILYPOND_GIT
environment variable.
But if I rely on other uses for the LILYPOND_GIT environment variable, then
it must use my normal git stash. Strikes me it would be safer to have a
duplicate stash just for patchy, and a different variable.
- is there any danger if this is also my dev machine with other
changed files in the git filesystem (e.g. the LSR copies, for
example).
Depends on what you specify in LILYPOND_GIT and the configuration file.
My brief look at one of the scripts showed an expectation of using a
RAMdisk. I'd rather use my SSD. Does this involve any changes?
Configuration of the respective paths.
In the scripts or in a config file?
Please confirm which script should be the main "master" and what to
look for when it's running.
I don't quite understand what you are asking here, but presumably you
mean lilypond-extra/patches/lilypond-patchy-staging.py or so.
I think that's what I meant.
"smtp_command: msmtp -C ~/.msmtp-patchy -t" means nothing to me.
That is command for mailing the completion message somewhere. I have no
idea what msmtp is supposed to be, but I replaced it with
mail dak
on my system. Which is not really what was intended, I guess, because
it mailed a mail to me addressed to Graham and the developer list.
msmtp would likely have bypassed me doing that.
I don't have a mail account on that machine, so would need to configure it
to use my normal SMTP provider, but don't know how to do that.
--
Phil Holmes
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, (continued)
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, David Kastrup, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Graham Percival, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, David Kastrup, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Graham Percival, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, David Kastrup, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan,
Phil Holmes <=
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Graham Percival, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, David Kastrup, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Graham Percival, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, David Kastrup, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Graham Percival, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Graham Percival, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/30
- Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/30