Re: Staging->Master

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Staging->Master
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I see that master has been updated with some patches from staging.
>>> Who was it that ran patchy to do this?
>>
>> That would have been me.  Since yesterday, I have a laptop with Core 2
>> duo processors available, and I've been running either flavor of patchy
>> a few times since in order to celebrate this in style.  If it is keeping
>> you from making meaningful experiments, I will stop.
>
> My experimentation phase has ended and I was expecting to have to run
> patchy-staging a couple of times a day until someone else was in a
> position to take over.

My box is not on permanently, and I don't run regularly, and use it for
other work.  So "take over" is putting it too strongly.

> I believe James indicated his big machine was on 24x7 - hence my
> instructions if he has some time to look at this.

I think that this would be the preferable solution.  Even though patchy
is quite less painful on my current machine than on the one I had been
using a few days ago, it takes its time.

> If you can run it a couple of times a day - no problem - I'll not do
> it myself.

I don't even think that staging moves that often currently.

-- 
David Kastrup