Re: Staging->Master

[David Kastrup]

Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> writes:

> On 2012-02-02 18:11, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
>> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
>>>
>>>> I believe James indicated his big machine was on 24x7 - hence my
>>>> instructions if he has some time to look at this.
>>>
>>> I think that this would be the preferable solution.  Even though patchy
>>> is quite less painful on my current machine than on the one I had been
>>> using a few days ago, it takes its time.
>>
>> My box runs it quite quickly and is not used for anything else.  It
>> has to be turned on to run patchy though.  Suggest you leave it to
>> me for now unless you're experimenting.
>
> My new office machine (on 24/7) is quite a powerful beast, and I
> usually don't to any expensive calculations. So, I can certainly set
> up a cronjob to run patchy regularly.

Since I just pushed about 4 patches (2 of them from me) and there has
been another translation merge (they tend to be prone to surprises in
particular when we have syntax changes), I started a patchy staging run
right now and it should be through in about 1-2 hours.  I want the
feedback timely in case anything went wrong.

-- 
David Kastrup