[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)
|
From: |
k-ohara5a5a |
|
Subject: |
Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:06:21 +0000 |
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/4/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/4/lily/beam.cc#newcode1743
lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
prev_offset,
Mike, Based on their contents, the arguments appear to be in a different
order:
grob, start, end, prev_offset
which is different than what you wrote in CG 10.13.2
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043),
k-ohara5a5a <=
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), mike, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), Keith OHara, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), Keith OHara, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), Keith OHara, 2012/04/27
- Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043), address@hidden, 2012/04/28