Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)

[Keith OHara]

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, <address@hidden> wrote:

> lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
> prev_offset,
>
> You're right - this is an error.  Do you want me to fix it or are you
> working on a patch into which the fix could be incorporated?

I am re-ordering the arguments in that one C function, but I don't read Scheme 
so I am not sure if the observed order of the data is the intended order, or 
the conventional order.

Your addition to the docs is pretty explicit that 'start' and 'end' are always 
the last two arguments, even in a chained-offset-callback where there are extra 
arguments.  On the other hand, call-pure-function seems to put 'start' and 
'end' in slots 2 and 3, with any other arguments attached later.