Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)

[address@hidden]

On 27 avr. 2012, at 23:55, Keith OHara wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:01:04 -0700, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 27 avr. 2012, at 19:58, Keith OHara wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Call pure function puts start and end in the final two slots.
>> 
>> You're right that, in the code above, the function gleaned from (cdr pure) 
>> gets [called with] (car args) start end (cdr args)).  I'm not exactly sure 
>> what that signifies,
> 
> It signifies that call-pure-function puts 'start' and 'end' in the second and 
> third slots,
> of the argument list for the pure function being called, with any additional 
> arguments following after 'end'.
> I'll change the relevant line in the C G.
> 

Ok - finally had a chance to check everything out.  You're absolutely right.  
Everything should be in the form of:

Side_position_interface::pure_y_aligned_side (SCM smob, SCM start, SCM end, SCM 
cur_off)

smob, start, end, other

Thanks for catching that!  This means that the order of arguments in 
pure_rest_collision needs to change as well.

Cheers,
MS