[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Sep 2012 07:21:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> \postfix: c2 d\p is unchanged
>> /prefix: for music functions like c2 /parenthesize d
>> .neutral: for commands which aren't attached to notes
>
> there would be confusion with augmentation dots, and possibly with
> rational numbers.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> What about this: A command used as a prefix needs to enclose its
>>> argument in braces (or whatever). Commands like \relative already
>>> look similar.
>>>
>>> postfix: c2 d\p
>>> prefix: c2 \parenthesize { d }
>>
>> Uh, oh, please forget this. It would be great if it could be that
>> simple :-/
>
> Actually, why not using this for music functions? I.e. \parenthesize
> { d } and d-\parenthesize.
d-\parenthesize-\p is supposed to do what then?
--
David Kastrup
- [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Graham Percival, 2012/09/01
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Graham Percival, 2012/09/01
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/03