[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands |
|
Date: |
Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:38:43 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:17:53PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> With things like
>
> c-\parenthesize-\p
>
> no hard and fast syntax rule will resolve the ambiguity caused by your
> "let's stick - before things applying to the previous element" proposal.
The hard and fast rule is "- attaches to a note; = attaches to the
prevous element". I don't think that we had a chance to get into
that during the big meeting.
- Graham
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, (continued)
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/06
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/06
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/06
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/06