[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Oct 2012 23:55:00 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:11 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> [...]
> In general, not requiring lookahead makes things more versatile.
> [...]
thanks - i think i more or less understand why we prefer not to
require lookahead.
However, i'm not sure whether you are asking us for any opinion (if
so, what is the question, and can we see "before/after" example?) or
just letting us know about lookahead - ?
Sorry for being so direct, but i'm very short on time recently :(
cheers,
Janek
- [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/07
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Keith OHara, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/08