[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments
|
From: |
Thomas Morley |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:48:46 +0200 |
2012/10/8 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Werner LEMBERG <wl <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> > I lean towards letting numbers in function arguments just evaluate
>>> > to themselves, never mind units.
>>
>> Sensible.
>>
>>> +1. However, it should be documented, together with the work-around.
Speaking as a user:
I never used 3\cm (don't like it), but I know others did (in \paper ).
So no objection from me, and there will be the workaround.
Do you suspect other disadvantages/changes than already mentioned?
-Harm
- [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/07
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/07
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Keith OHara, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, David Kastrup, 2012/10/08
- Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/08