Re: [Parser] Lookahead in music function arguments

[David Kastrup]

Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:11 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [...]
>> In general, not requiring lookahead makes things more versatile.
>> [...]
>
> thanks - i think i more or less understand why we prefer not to
> require lookahead.
> However, i'm not sure whether you are asking us for any opinion (if
> so, what is the question, and can we see "before/after" example?) or
> just letting us know about lookahead - ?
> Sorry for being so direct, but i'm very short on time recently :(

I am considering removing existing functionality that's not likely to
have seen any use so far, but at least is nailed down in regtests
(input/regression/optional-args-backup.ly).  So I am looking for
objections.

-- 
David Kastrup