[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:53:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:45:09AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> So, \tuplet y/x with the exact meaning of \times x/y is less confusing
>> because it's not "times" vs "time" anymore, and the straightforward
>> fraction is just "music without the maths". So, I predict a widespread
>> adoption.
>
> Do we really need to use the same fraction notation, though?
You mean, like 3/4 meaning 3 notes to 4 parts of a measure?
> I mean, in music we see 3:2 (if people are being pedantic). I'd be
> much happier with \tuplet 3:2 { } meaning the same thing as \times 2/3
> { }
3/2 is a FRACTION, which is a lexical item available as a music function
argument. The proposed \tuplet implementations were presented as Scheme
code that could just be used in a document without recompilation.
In contrast, : is being used for chord and tremolo notation. It has no
relation to music function arguments. The price for using it would be
making \tuplet a reserved word specially treated in the parser and
dealing with the interference of : with its other meanings in the
parser, and having the command hardwired and not user-serviceable and
not documented as a music function.
That's not a reasonable price to pay for a one-off command.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, (continued)
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Benkő Pál, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Benkő Pál, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Graham Percival, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/10
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/10