Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

[Joe Neeman]

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:21 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

Joe Neeman <address@hidden> writes:

> But now that we are giving a hook into push, I think that the
> non-pushing default of override will cause problems.

I consider it utterly ludicrous that the mere availability of \temporary
will magically cause problems with the existing usage of \override,

Is the example I posted (and which you snipped) utterly ludicrous?

 

but
there is no point in continuing this farce as I have already given up.

Do you really consider this discussion a farce? I thought I was making reasonable points, but if they are indeed farcical then perhaps I should give up too.