Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

[Werner LEMBERG]

> I completely agree that we need a function that changes a property
> in a non-destructive way.

Me too, in case there was ever a doubt about this.

> If we were to completely re-design the lilypond language, I would
> suggest \override, \revert and \clear (as push, pop and clear
> stack), but they currently have a slightly different meaning.

Yes!  This is what I wanted to point out, apparently with bad wording
which made David think into the wrong direction.

> The real problems we currently have are [...]

Thanks for this!  I fully agree with all your reasoning.


    Werner