Re: Part combiner: separate split state and voice names

[Dan Eble]

On Nov 29, 2014, at 18:48 , Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Oh, so you meant let the Scheme portion dictate to partcombine_iterator which 
> _input_ voice, as it iterates the music expression produced by \partcombine, 
> to use.

My reasoning probably needs more clarification.  The iterator takes sequences 
of events and routes them into voices.  So, I thought that where now the Scheme 
portion produces simply ‘unisilence, it might produce something like (’silence 
“shared” #f) to tell the iterator that both parts are silent, the first part 
should be placed into the voice named “shared”, and the second part should be 
dropped.  That’s what I meant by telling the iterator which output voice to use.

Telling the iterator which input to use would be something like defining new 
states ‘unisilence1 and ‘unisilence2.
— 
Dan