Re: Make Grob::name accessible to Scheme (issue 203090043 by address@hidden)

[David Nalesnik]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:30 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I suppose even better would be to come up with a way to automatically
> > document public Scheme functions, but I wouldn't know how to do that
> > at this point.
>
> Shouldn't actually be too hard.  But I doubt that all functions with doc
> strings would actually make sense in the internals manual.
>
>
True.  It could be something sloppy which is introduced with a warning to
that effect.  Functions might be organized by the source file.