Re: Issue 4622: create a <Part-combiner> class (issue 265260043 by address@hidden)

[nine . fierce . ballads]

On 2015/09/30 12:58:38, dak wrote:
> I don't think that externally we have much to gain from
> having it fall apart into different implementations rather than using
different
> parameters for driving a single partcombiner.

I'm not sure I understand you clearly.  Which one of these describes
this patch, and are you opposing these changes or just stating
observations?

https://codereview.appspot.com/265260043/