[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reasons why a LilyPond-to-MEI conversion should be developed
|
From: |
Richard Shann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reasons why a LilyPond-to-MEI conversion should be developed |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:05:55 +0100 |
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 01:39 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> e.g. if LilyPond should consume
> > MEI
>
> Interesting thought. I should be surprised if MEI were to consent in
> granting LilyPond this honour (as which I’d consider it).
I think what was meant was "the lilypond executable should parse MEI
syntax and typeset from it", rather than the LilyPond organization
should take over the MEI one ...
Richard