Re: Reasons why a LilyPond-to-MEI conversion should be developed

[Paul Morris]

> On Oct 24, 2015, at 3:02 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> The latest is that the project is over and I have a dump of stuff I need
> to integrate into LilyPond before it may be useful.  My motivation to do
> that is so-so as I've not yet seen a cent of the tutor's money yet (and
> no mention whatsoever that there is any intent of or procedure for a
> payout) for the considerable work I put in so far, and there does not
> seem much of a point to ask for it when the code is not yet in LilyPond.
> 
> So it will likely arrive sometime next year.  It's just a starting
> point, anyway, but it uses decidedly different techniques than current
> converters.

Glad to hear that it resulted in code that can be integrated into LilyPond, 
moving things further in this direction.  Sorry to hear that google has not 
paid you yet…  it’s not fair for them to not uphold their end of the deal.  

> Anybody wanting to get that dump and a sketch of how to integrate it is
> welcome.  It's Scheme-only work requiring digging through LilyPond's own
> Scheme internals for existing hooks in order to integrate it into a
> command line utility.

Would it make sense to start an issue for this with a link to the dump or a zip 
file of it?

-Paul