[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Auto-generated code, (was Re: Reasons why a LilyPond-to-MEI conversi
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Auto-generated code, (was Re: Reasons why a LilyPond-to-MEI conversion should be developed) |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:12:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
Dear Richard,
first I want to emphasize that this was not against you or Denemo, just
a connection between my favoured workflows and the tools I use.
I don't understand 'traverse the staffs' in your sentence:
> It *does* provide a
> default LilyPond output, but you can just as easily traverse the staffs
> you have entered generating the output you would prefer
If I used Denemo and I wanted to do tweaks in lilypond code, I would
have to work within auto-generated ly code, wouldn't I?
Best,
Joram
Re: Reasons why a LilyPond-to-MEI conversion should be developed, Noeck, 2015/10/24