[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Antonio Ospite |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:49:51 +0100 |
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:37:31 +0100
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2016-11-19 16:05 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite <address@hidden>:
>
[...]
> > With this setup your test file should work.
>
>
> The test-file indeed works, but not "make LANGS='' doc"
>
> Earlier every file in the regtests gave a gs-error, now it happens
> frequently, but not always.
>
> Here a cutoff from the log for two files:
> input/regression/center-title.ly worked
> input/regression/chord-name-minor.ly not
> I don't get the essential difference...
>
[...]
> Writing header field `texidoc' to `./56/lily-44b4b5eb.texidoc'...
> Writing ./56/lily-44b4b5eb-1.signature
> Layout output to `./56/lily-44b4b5eb.eps'...
> Converting to `./56/lily-44b4b5eb.pdf'...
> warning: `(gs -q -dNOSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4
> -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite
> -sOutputFile=./56/lily-44b4b5eb.pdf -c.setpdfwrite
> -f./56/lily-44b4b5eb.eps)' failed (256)
>
> As before compiling them as standalone files works without problems.
>
Can I look at your ./56/lily-44b4b5eb.eps file?
Ciao,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/20
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/20
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Antonio Ospite <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23