[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:16:15 +0100 |
> On 3 Nov 2018, at 09:46, Torsten Hämmerle <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Just leave do not specify the tonic scale step in the scale/key definiton!
> That's all! ;)
> That way it will never be printed in the key signature.
> If we set up the two special key signatures bestenigâr and revnaknüma
> completely without step 0 (and 7), the definitions will look like this:
>
> bestenigar = #'((1 . -24/53)(2 . -24/53)(3 . 0)(4 . -24/53)(5 . -48/53)(6 .
> -24/53))
> revnaknuma = #'((1 . -24/53)(2 . 0)(3 . 0)(4 . 0)(5 . -24/53)(6 . -24/53))
I was just about to suggest an implementation of that, but it is good if
LilyPond already can do it! :-)
It might be usable for other types of scales, like pentatonic, if people don't
bother to write key signature accidentals for notes that do not appear.
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Hans Åberg, 2018/11/01
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Adam Good, 2018/11/01
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Hans Åberg, 2018/11/01
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Adam Good, 2018/11/02
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Hans Åberg, 2018/11/02
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Torsten Hämmerle, 2018/11/03
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Adam Good, 2018/11/03
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Hans Åberg, 2018/11/03
- Message not available
- Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Hans Åberg, 2018/11/14
Re: Turkish makam using regular.ly, Hans Åberg, 2018/11/02