[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 3
|
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
|
Subject: |
Re: Python 3 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:29:30 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.0 |
Am Samstag, den 21.09.2019, 13:09 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> >> `git add -p' is your friend to do that conveniently.
>
> >
>
> > Sure, that is the usual suggestion. But I'm not sure if that is
>
> > really helpful here because none of these changes will do anything
>
> > on its own.
>
>
> What do you mean with `none will do anything on its own'?
>
> > So my question is whether the patch is too large to go as one "fix
>
> > that script for Python 3"?
>
>
> Well, I prefer a series of patches instead of a single patch.
Ok, I'll split the third one. My concern was that a single part of the
series won't bring any benefit on its own. So for example only changing
the division operator will not make musicxml2ly work with Python 3.
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- 2.20 where are we?, Andrew Bernard, 2019/09/20
- Re: 2.20 where are we?, Urs Liska, 2019/09/21
- Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=
- Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, James, 2019/09/21
Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23