[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 3
|
From: |
James |
|
Subject: |
Re: Python 3 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:01:55 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
Hello,
On 21/09/2019 17:57, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[...] I've split the third patch ("Fix musicxml2ly with Python 3")
into four smaller logical groups. I don't really mind which version
is applied, the outcome is the same.
LGTM, thanks.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Sorry for jumping in here.
I assume the testing of this is going to be done 'without' me?
Or do I need to help here (in whatever way I can) with regard to testing
Python3 patches?
I'm not set up to use GUB or anything specific with my own make env.
Let me know what, if anything, I can do to help.
James
- Re: 2.20 where are we?, (continued)
- Re: 2.20 where are we?, Urs Liska, 2019/09/21
- Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/21
- Re: Python 3,
James <=
Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/26
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/27
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/30