[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?)
|
From: |
Joram |
|
Subject: |
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:22:28 +0200 |
Am 27.09.19 um 22:34 schrieb Matthew Peveler:
> long vs int, unicode vs str, StringIO vs io, iter.next vs
> iter.__next__, reload, xrange vs range.
It is very well feasible to support both version. I hope by shims you
mean something like¹
from __future__ import division, print_function
from builtins import range
because there is no need to customly write those. I consider the link
quite helpful.
Cheers
¹ https://python-future.org/compatible_idioms.html
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), (continued)
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/26
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/27
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?),
Joram <=
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
Re: 2.20 where are we?, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21